Case Examine: How the Cookie Monster Ate 22% of Our Visibility
The creator’s views are fully his or her personal (excluding the unlikely occasion of hypnosis) and should not at all times mirror the views of Moz.
Final 12 months, the workforce at Homeday — one of many main property tech firms in Germany — made the choice emigrate to a brand new content material administration system (CMS). The targets of the migration had been, amongst different issues, elevated web page velocity and making a state-of-the-art, future-proof web site with all the required options. One of many principal motivators for the migration was to allow content material editors to work extra freely in creating pages with out the assistance of builders.
After evaluating a number of CMS choices, we selected Contentful for its trendy know-how stack, with a superior expertise for each editors and builders. From a technical viewpoint, Contentful, as a headless CMS, permits us to decide on which rendering technique we wish to use.
We’re at the moment finishing up the migration in a number of levels, or waves, to scale back the danger of issues which have a large-scale adverse affect. In the course of the first wave, we encountered a problem with our cookie consent, which led to a visibility lack of virtually 22% inside 5 days. On this article I am going to describe the issues we had been going through throughout this primary migration wave and the way we resolved them.
Organising the primary test-wave
For the primary test-wave we selected 10 search engine optimization pages with excessive visitors however low conversion charges. We established an infrastructure for reporting and monitoring these 10 pages:
Rank-tracking for many related key phrases
search engine optimization dashboard (DataStudio, Moz Professional, SEMRush, Search Console, Google Analytics)
After a complete planning and testing phase, we migrated the primary 10 search engine optimization pages to the brand new CMS in December 2021. Though a number of challenges occurred throughout the testing section (elevated loading instances, greater HTML Doc Object Mannequin, and so forth.) we determined to go reside as we did not see massive blocker and we needed emigrate the primary testwave earlier than christmas.
First efficiency evaluate
Very enthusiastic about attaining step one of the migration, we took a have a look at the efficiency of the migrated pages on the following day.
What we noticed subsequent actually did not please us.
In a single day, the visibility of tracked key phrases for the migrated pages decreased from 62.35% to 53.59% — we misplaced 8.76% of visibility in in the future!
Because of this steep drop in rankings, we carried out one other in depth spherical of testing. Amongst different issues we examined for protection/ indexing points, if all meta tags had been included, structured information, inside hyperlinks, web page velocity and cell friendliness.
Second efficiency evaluate
All of the articles had a cache date after the migration and the content material was absolutely listed and being learn by Google. Furthermore, we may exclude a number of migration threat elements (change of URLs, content material, meta tags, format, and so forth.) as sources of error, as there hasn’t been any modifications.
Visibility of our tracked key phrases suffered one other drop to 40.60% over the following few days, making it a complete drop of just about 22% inside 5 days. This was additionally clearly proven compared to the competitors of the tracked key phrases (right here “estimated visitors”), however the visibility appeared analogous.
Following the cookie crumbs
We needed to determine points as shortly as doable and do fast bug-fixing and decrease extra adverse results and visitors drops. We lastly received the primary actual trace of which technical motive could possibly be the trigger when certainly one of our instruments confirmed us that the variety of pages with excessive exterior linking, in addition to the variety of pages with most content material dimension, went up. It is vital that pages do not exceed the utmost content material dimension as pages with a really great amount of physique content material might not be absolutely listed. Concerning the excessive exterior linking it will be significant that each one exterior hyperlinks are reliable and related for customers. It was suspicious that the variety of exterior hyperlinks went up similar to this.
Each metrics had been disproportionately excessive in comparison with the variety of pages we migrated. However why?
After checking which exterior hyperlinks had been added to the migrated pages, we noticed that Google was studying and indexing the cookie consent kind for all migrated pages. We carried out a web site search, checking for the content material of the cookie consent, and noticed our idea confirmed:
This led to a number of issues:
There was tons of duplicated content material created for every web page resulting from indexing the cookie consent kind.
The content material dimension of the migrated pages drastically elevated. It is a downside as pages with a really great amount of physique content material might not be absolutely listed.
The variety of exterior outgoing hyperlinks drastically elevated.
Our snippets immediately confirmed a date on the SERPs. This is able to recommend a weblog or information article, whereas most articles on Homeday are evergreen content material. As well as, as a result of date showing, the meta description was lower off.
However why was this taking place? In line with our service supplier, Cookiebot, search engine crawlers access websites simulating a full consent. Therefore, they achieve entry to all content material and copy from the cookie consent banners are usually not listed by the crawler.
So why wasn’t this the case for the migrated pages? We crawled and rendered the pages with totally different person brokers, however nonetheless could not discover a hint of the Cookiebot within the supply code.
Investigating Google DOMs and looking for an answer
To validate that Google was studying the copy from the cookie consent banner, we used the URL inspection device of Google Search Console. We in contrast the DOM of a migrated web page with the DOM of a non-migrated web page. Throughout the DOM of a migrated web page, we lastly discovered the cookie consent content material:
The one script loaded on our previous pages was uc.js, which is accountable for the cookie consent banner. It’s the one script we want in each web page to deal with person consent. It shows the cookie consent banner with out indexing the content material and saves the person’s resolution (in the event that they agree or disagree to the utilization of cookies).
For the migrated pages, apart from uc.js, there was additionally a cd.js file loading. If we’ve got a web page, the place we wish to present extra details about our cookies to the person and index the cookie information, then we’ve got to make use of the cd.js. We thought that each recordsdata are depending on one another, which isn’t appropriate. The uc.js can run alone. The cd.js file was the explanation why the content material of the cookie banner received rendered and listed.
It took some time to search out it as a result of we thought the second file was only a pre-requirement for the primary one. We decided that merely eradicating the loaded cd.js file could be the answer.
Efficiency evaluate after implementing the answer
The day we deleted the file, our key phrase visibility was at 41.70%, which was nonetheless 21% decrease than pre-migration.
Nonetheless, the day after deleting the file, our visibility elevated to 50.77%, and the following day it was virtually again to regular at 60.11%. The estimated visitors behaved equally. What a reduction!
I can think about that many SEOs have handled tiny points like this. It appears trivial, however led to a major drop in visibility and visitors throughout the migration. This is the reason I recommend migrating in waves and blocking sufficient time for investigating technical errors earlier than and after the migration. Furthermore, maintaining an in depth have a look at the positioning’s efficiency throughout the weeks after the migration is essential. These are undoubtedly my key takeaways from this migration wave. We simply accomplished the second migration wave at first of Might 2022 and I can state that thus far no main bugs appeared. We’ll have two extra waves and full the migration hopefully efficiently by the top of June 2022.
The efficiency of the migrated pages is sort of again to regular now, and we’ll proceed with the following wave.